Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve?

16 references·10 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
2017The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences1,452 cited
2014Beyond Power Calculations1,341 cited
2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,314 cited
2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
2011Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).977 cited
2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
2014The evolution of self-control819 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1956

A case history in scientific method.

633 cited

Cited by

2023The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes137 cited
2022Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education90 cited
2020Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects66 cited
2023Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes54 cited
2021Replications in Comparative Psychology23 cited
2020Trialling Meta-Research in Comparative Cognition: Claims and Statistical Inference in Animal Physical Cognition19 cited
2023Reporting and interpreting non-significant results in animal cognition research19 cited
2022Teaching Open and Reproducible Scholarship: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base for Current Pedagogical Methods and their Outcomes16 cited
2024Comparative Cognition Needs Big Team Science: How Large-Scale Collaborations Will Unlock the Future of the Field12 cited
2022Outgoing Editors’ Reflections11 cited