SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving The Reproducibility of Science
6 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Improving The Reproducibility of Science (2020)Improving The Reproducibility of ScienceThe Registered Reports Revolution Lessons in Cultural Reform (2019)The Registered Reports Revolu…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)What does research reproducib…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The fickle P value generates irreproducible results (2015)The fickle P value generates …Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates (2018)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update (2016)A solution to minimum sample size for regressions (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Scientific Utopia (2012)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis (2019)Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices (2020)A template for preregistration of quantitative research in psychology: Report of the joint psychological societies preregistration task force. (2021)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
  • 2015The fickle P value generates irreproducible results766 cited
  • 2019The Registered Reports Revolution Lessons in Cultural Reform43 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work