SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
UiT-researchers’ attitudes and practices towards open access publication : lessons learnt for improving self-archiving in institutional repository
14 references·0 citing·49 second hop
UiT-researchers’ attitudes and practices towards open access publication : lessons learnt for improving self-archiving in institutional repository (2019)UiT-researchers’ attitudes and practices …The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals (2018)The World’s Approach toward P…Few UK universities have adopted rules against impact-factor abuse (2018)Few UK universities have adop…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals (2017)Understanding researchers’ in…Publish or impoverish (2017)Publish or impoverishDiamond Open Access in the quest for interdisciplinarity and excellence (2017)Diamond Open Access in the qu…The role of science in fisheries management in Europe: from Mode 1 to Mode 2 (2016)The role of science in fisher…Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016)Peer Review Quality and Trans…Gratis and Libre Open Access (2016)Gratis and Libre Open AccessOpen access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature (2015)Open access repositories as c…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing. (2004)The nine flavours of open acc…Sorting the esoteica from the exoterica: There's plenty of room in cyberspace — a response to fuller (1995)Sorting the esoteica from the…Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach (2002)Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Correlation and Interaction Visualization of Altmetric Indicators Extracted From Scholarly Social Network Activities: Dimensions and Structure (2013)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Bias in peer review (2012)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Revolution in the Means of Production of Knowledge (1991)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Interactive Cognition: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Quote/Commenting (1995)Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals (1995)Electronic publishing in radiology: Beginnings, current status, and expanding horizons (2004)Scholar as E-Publisher (2010)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2006)Open knowledge: challenges and facts (2010)Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting (2012)Grey literature archiving pattern in open access (OA) repositories with special emphasis on Indian OA repositories (2018)Can open access increase LIS research’s policy impact? Using regression analysis and causal inference (2023)Policy citations of scientometric articles: an altmetric study (2024)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study (2020)An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council (2021)Behavioral Reluctance in Adopting Open Access Publishing: Insights From a Goal-Directed Perspective (2021)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)China statistical yearbook (1988)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA score (2015)Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers (2016)Scientific peer review (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals905 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals814 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure502 cited
  • 2017Publish or impoverish328 cited
  • 2016Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals166 cited
  • 2004The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing.100 cited
  • 2016Gratis and Libre Open Access72 cited
  • 2017Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals29 cited
  • 2015Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature26 cited
  • 1995Sorting the esoteica from the exoterica: There's plenty of room in cyberspace — a response to fuller17 cited
  • 2016The role of science in fisheries management in Europe: from Mode 1 to Mode 215 cited
  • 2017Diamond Open Access in the quest for interdisciplinarity and excellence13 cited
  • 2018The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals11 cited
  • 2018Few UK universities have adopted rules against impact-factor abuse7 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work