SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Title analysis of (systematic) scoping review studies: Chaos or consistency?
16 references·1 citing·21 second hopsampled
Title analysis of (systematic) scoping review studies: Chaos or consistency? (2020)Title analysis of (systematic) scoping re…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Methodology for jbi scoping reviews (2015)Methodology for jbi scoping r…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)An Introduction to Systematic…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature (2009)What are scoping studies? A r…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Corporate social responsibility (CSR): a contemporary review of practices, impacts, and future directions (2025)Corporate social responsibili…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,574 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,124 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,802 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,310 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,904 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,246 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews1,242 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,162 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,087 cited
  • 2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature
863 cited
  • 2015Methodology for jbi scoping reviews365 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Corporate social responsibility (CSR): a contemporary review of practices, impacts, and future directions21 cited