SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics (2020)Who reviews for predatory journals? A stu…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Blacklists and Whitelists To …What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Predatory journals: Who publi…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)A walk on the wild side: ‘Pre…Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Stop this waste of people, an…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Intended and unintended conse…Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community – Results from an international study (2008)Peer review in scholarly jour…String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. (1990)String Comparator Metrics and…Avoiding publishing in predatory journals: An evaluation algorithm (2020)Avoiding publishing in predat…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B. (1975)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)A Theory for Record Linkage (1969)The State of Record Linkage and Current Research Problems (1999)A taxonomy of privacy-preserving record linkage techniques (2012)Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)AI-assisted peer review (2021)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 1990String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage.787 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2012Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey355 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 2017Stop this waste of people, animals and money284 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?245 cited
  • 2018A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations158 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review142 cited
  • 2019Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

131 cited
  • 2008Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community – Results from an international study102 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Avoiding publishing in predatory journals: An evaluation algorithm7 cited