Succession Politics and Factional Journalism in Zimbabwe: A Case of The Chronicle in Zimbabwe

Wallace Chuma · Mbongeni Jonny Msimanga · Lungile Augustine Tshuma

35 citations0/0 files storedAfrican Journalism Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Media Studies and Communication Journalism and Media Studies African studies and sociopolitical issues

Abstract

This paper is a critical exploration of the emergence and manifestations of a phenomenon we refer to as “factional” or “succession” journalism within the state media in the context of the tussle over the succession of the late former Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe. Using the state-controlled Chronicle daily newspaper as a case study, we seek to examine the role and influence of editors and journalists in the negotiation of power in the context of reporting a contested succession of Mugabe in 2016. We locate “factional journalism” in the context of the capture of the state media by the ruling party and the virtual erosion of journalistic agency in the state media institutions. We argue that whereas the onset of the “Zimbabwe crisis” spawned the creation of different and polarised forms of journalism in the country (i.e. oppositional and patriotic journalism; see Ranger, 2005. “The rise of patriotic journalism in Zimbabwe and its possible implications”. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 2: 8–17; Chuma 2008. “Mediating the 2000 elections in Zimbabwe: competing journalisms in a society at the crossroads”. African Journalism Studies 29 (1): 22–41), within the “patriotic journalism” camp also emerged a new strand of “factional journalism” linked closely to the fierce contest for the succession of Robert Mugabe within Zanu PF. We also argue that the succession issue presented a poignant moment at which political journalism at the public media became subordinate to whichever faction held sway in the information/media portfolio in government, and which faction deployed its allocative powers to reward and punish specific forms of political reporting. We apply a limited qualitative content analysis of news stories on the succession issue and complement this with qualitative in-depth interviews with journalists reporting on the subject. This approach arguably provides a much more holistic picture of the factors at play in the production of political content on the subject.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 1990Qualitative evaluation and research methods 1990Basic Content Analysis 1989Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.1978Policing the Crisis 2009Normative theories of the media: journalism in democratic societies 2011An Introduction to Political Communication 1989La manufactura del consenso. Herman es, chomsky n. Manufacturing consent. The political economy of mass media, new york, pantheon books, 1988

Cited by

2022Reconstruction and Adaptation in Times of a Contagious Crisis: A Case of African Newsrooms’ Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic 2023Contending with Sexual Harassment: A Study of Southern African Female Journalists’ Experiences 2022“Playing” in the Eyes of the Ferret Team: Examining the Use of Surveillance Strategies by Zimbabwean Journalists 2023Online Harassment of Journalists in Zimbabwe: Experiences, Coping Strategies and Implications 2024Play on Twitter During Health Crisis in Non-Democratic Context: Gratification or Dissent?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.