SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review
5 references·0 citing·25 second hop
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review (2020)Are patients willing to accept longer tra…Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship (2018)Quality ratings of reviews in…How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity (2018)How well do discrete choice e…GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness (2018)GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessi…Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands (2007)Why do patients bypass the ne…Patient Preferences for Location of Care (1999)Patient Preferences for Locat…Equality, Efficiency, and Market Fundamentals: The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform (2002)Assessing Competition in Hospital Care Markets: The Importance of Accounting for Quality Differentiation (2003)Hospital Choice of Rural Medicare Beneficiaries: Patient, Hospital Attributes, and the Patient–Physician Relationship (2004)Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands (2013)Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002–2013 (2016)Patient choice modelling: how do patients choose their hospitals? (2017)Numbers are better than words (1983)Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations1 (2000)Quantifying Benefit–Risk Preferences for Medical Interventions: An Overview of a Growing Empirical Literature (2013)Association of Hospital Critical Access Status With Surgical Outcomes and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries (2016)EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach (2018)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions (2022)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging (2021)Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021)Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies (2022)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Patient Preferences for Location of Care457 cited
  • 2018How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity374 cited
  • 2018GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness281 cited
  • 2007Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands103 cited
  • 2018Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work