SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Standardized Test Procedure for External Human–Machine Interfaces of Automated Vehicles
16 references·0 citing·41 second hopsampled
Standardized Test Procedure for External Human–Machine Interfaces of Automated Vehicles (2020)Standardized Test Procedure for External …Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic (2020)Defining interactions: a conc…How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? (2019)How Should Automated Vehicles…External Human–Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements (2019)External Human–Machine Interf…External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work (2019)External Human–Machine Interf…External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions (2019)External Human-Machine Interf…What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? (2018)What externally presented inf…Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment (2018)Investigating pedestrian sugg…Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment (2018)Interaction between pedestria…Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations (2018)Designing the interaction of …Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians (2018)Communicating Intent of Autom…Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction (2018)Communicating Awareness and I…An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? (2018)An experimental study to inve…SAV2P (2017)SAV2PEvaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles (2017)Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pede…Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey (2016)Human factors of transitions …User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)User Acceptance of Informatio…Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)The theory of planned behavior (1991)A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2014)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)Naturalistic Decision Making (2008)How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving (2016)Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays (2018)Decision-making in driver-automation shared control: A review and perspectives (2020)Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model (2000)Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2009)External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed? (2020)Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles (2020)Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives (2021)The Concept of Information Overload - A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines (2004) (2008)Constructing grounded theory (2014)Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle (2014)Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles' external human-machine interfaces (2020)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential (1994)Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective (2019)Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving (2021)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An Adaptation of the UTAUT Model (2016)Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles (2016)A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology (1998)Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability (2014)From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving (2020)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Patent and Trademark Office (2017)PERCEIVED SAFETY IN PHYSICAL HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION - A SURVEY (2021)Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research (1988)Does automation bias decision-making? (1999)Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment. (2004)How To Do Things With Words (1975)Grounding in communication. (1991)Using Language (1996)Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian’ crossing behavior (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2003User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View148,734 cited
  • 2018Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction380 cited
  • 2019External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions360 cited
  • 2018Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians299 cited
  • 2018Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations268 cited
  • 2020Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic252 cited
  • 2018An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?236 cited
  • 2018Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment233 cited
  • 2016Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey209 cited
  • 2018What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?206 cited
  • 2018Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment195 cited
  • 2017Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles185 cited
  • 2019External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

146 cited
  • 2019How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?136 cited
  • 2019External Human–Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements122 cited
  • 2017SAV2P103 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.