SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ten simple rules for providing effective bioinformatics research support
6 references·0 citing·25 second hop
Ten simple rules for providing effective bioinformatics research support (2020)Ten simple rules for providing effective …Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 (2018)Reproducible research practic…Big Data Application in Biomedical Research and Health Care: A Literature Review (2016)Big Data Application in Biome…A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)A Framework for Improving the…Significance of Scope in Project Success (2013)Significance of Scope in Proj…Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough (2012)Using Effect Size—or Why the …Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating procedures (2011)Quality assurance: Importance…The role of project management in achieving project success (1996)Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination (1999)The “real” success factors on projects (2002)Exploring factors behind project scope creep – stakeholders’ perspective (2019)Impact of project monitoring and evaluation practices on construction project success criteria in Ghana (2019)Risk factors causing cost overruns in road networks (2022)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy (2016)Framework for advancing rigorous research (2020)Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? (2021)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)Standard Operating Procedures (What Are They Good For ?) (2012)Quality assurance in reverse logistics supply chain of demolition waste: A systematic literature review (2020)Provenance of specimen and data – A prerequisite for AI development in computational pathology (2023)Childhood adversity and adult depression: The protective role of psychological resilience (2017)Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2019)Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes (2020)Emergence of Big Data Research in Operations Management, Information Systems, and Healthcare: Past Contributions and Future Roadmap (2017)Big Data Analytics in Medicine and Healthcare (2018)Trends and Future Perspective Challenges in Big Data (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough5,550 cited
  • 2016Big Data Application in Biomedical Research and Health Care: A Literature Review522 cited
  • 2018Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017267 cited
  • 2011Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating procedures164 cited
  • 2013Significance of Scope in Project Success118 cited
  • 2016A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences46 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work