No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract The article explores salient philosophic orientations through research grounded on often consulted scholarly literature. The central argument is that social work paradigms have swayed through the decades. The scientific objectivism and positivism of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, influenced social work practice, but social work always performed at the edges of science because of the unpredictable nature of human phenomena. In the postmodern sense, social work has been a collage where science, art, rationality and intuition, systematic and unsystematic knowledge meet. Constructivism evolved relatively recently as an attractive more pliable alternative that can accommodate different ways of viewing the world and different interpretations of ‘reality’. Constructivism offers a framework more receptive to the post-colonial cultural and identity challenges that social work scholarship and practice now encounters. This narrative hopes to make social work professionals aware of the pitfalls of adopting single methodological options instead of engaging in the ongoing exploration of alternatives.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.