Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 4: Confounding and other concerns in meta-epidemiological studies of bias

8 references·1 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
2017Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study381 cited
2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research380 cited
2020Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study298 cited
2016Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies283 cited
2018Association Between Publication Characteristics and Treatment Effect Estimates60 cited
2019Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta‐epidemiological study—the MetaBLIND study as a case45 cited

Cited by

2022Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work