SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
YouTube: Searching for answers about breast cancer
13 references·4 citing·44 second hop
YouTube: Searching for answers about breast cancer (2020)YouTube: Searching for answers about brea…Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading (2019)Information on surgical treat…Evaluation of YouTube as an educational resource for treatment options of common dermatologic conditions (2019)Evaluation of YouTube as an e…YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn? (2018)YouTube Videos as a Source of…YouTube as a source of patient information for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate (2018)YouTube as a source of patien…The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment (2018)The reliability of YouTube vi…Does YouTube provide high-quality resources for patient education on atrial fibrillation ablation? (2018)Does YouTube provide high-qua…Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube (2018)Dissemination of Misinformati…Assessment of YouTube as an Informative Resource on Facial Plastic Surgery Procedures (2018)Assessment of YouTube as an I…Are YouTube videos useful for patient self-education in type 2 diabetes? (2018)Are YouTube videos useful for…YouTube as a source of health information: Analysis of sun protection and skin cancer prevention related issues (2017)YouTube as a source of health…YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control (2015)YouTube Videos Related to Ski…YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer (2015)YouTube as a source of inform…Popular on YouTube: A critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma (2015)Popular on YouTube: A critica…Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025)Quality of Cancer-Related Inf…Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery (2023)Evaluating YouTube as a Sourc…Netiquette for Social Media Engagement for Oncology Professionals (2022)Netiquette for Social Media E…Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo (2022)Accuracy and Quality of YouTu…“People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy (2013)YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly (2013)Visual Cancer Communication on Social Media: An Examination of Content and Effects of #Melanomasucks (2018)YouTube coverage of COVID-19 vaccine development: implications for awareness and uptake (2020)Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer (2021)YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis (2007)Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube (2013)Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis (2017)YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (2019)Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online (2010)Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review (2014)Popular videos related to low back pain on YouTube™ do not reflect current clinical guidelines: a cross-sectional study (2021)YouTube as a source of (mis)information on allergic rhinitis (2022)COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Content Analysis of Nigerian YouTube Videos (2023)Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? (2001)YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (2010)YouTube As an Information Source for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Video Content (2014)Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer (2019)YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment (2019)Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube (2021)Misinformation and Its Correction (2012)The spreading of misinformation online (2016)Analysis of the Most Viewed First 50 Videos on YouTube about Breast Cancer (2020)Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation? (2021)Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms (2022)Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature (2013)Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome? (2015)Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation (2022)Video clips of the Mediterranean Diet on YouTube TM : A social Media Content Analysis (2022)Assessment of the quality, content, and reliability of YouTube® videos on diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review with cross-sectional analysis comparing peer-reviewed videos (2024)YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information (2009)Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review (2018)Evidence‐based quality and accuracy of YouTube videos about nephrolithiasis (2020)YouTube and Men's Health: A Review of the Current Literature (2021)An Analysis of YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Patients About Refractive Surgery (2019)YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review. (2019)Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study (2020)What Does the Public Think? Examining Plastic Surgery Perceptions through the Twitterverse (2018)The Educational Quality of Neurosurgical Resources on YouTube (2019)YouTube Is a Poor‐Quality Source for Patient Information on Rehabilitation and Return to Sports After Hip Arthroscopy (2021)Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations (2019)Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube358 cited
  • 2015YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer306 cited
  • 2018The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment99 cited
  • 2018YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn?92 cited
  • 2015Popular on YouTube: A critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma72 cited
  • 2019Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading67 cited
  • 2015YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control57 cited
  • 2018Are YouTube videos useful for patient self-education in type 2 diabetes?54 cited
  • 2017YouTube as a source of health information: Analysis of sun protection and skin cancer prevention related issues52 cited
  • 2018Assessment of YouTube as an Informative Resource on Facial Plastic Surgery Procedures45 cited
  • 2018YouTube as a source of patient information for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate36 cited
  • 2019Evaluation of YouTube as an educational resource for treatment options of common dermatologic conditions35 cited
  • 2018Does YouTube provide high-quality resources for patient education on atrial fibrillation ablation?34 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2023Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery30 cited
  • 2022Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo21 cited
  • 2022Netiquette for Social Media Engagement for Oncology Professionals17 cited
  • 2025Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis16 cited