Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building

Abstract

Scholars have long debated how rigor can be achieved in qualitative analysis. To answer this question, we need to better understand how theory is generated from data. Qualitative analysis is, at its core, a categorization process. Nevertheless, despite a surge of interest in categorization within the social sciences, insights from categorization theory have not yet been applied to our understanding of qualitative analysis. Drawing from categorization theory, we argue that the movement from data to theory is an active process in which researchers choose between multiple moves that help them to make sense of their data. In addition, we develop a framework of the main moves that people use when they categorize data and demonstrate that evidence of these moves can also be found in past qualitative scholarship. Our framework emphasizes that if we are not sufficiently reflexive and explicit about the active analytical processes that generate theoretical insights, we cannot be transparent and, thus, rigorous about how we analyze data. We discuss the implications of our framework for increasing rigor in qualitative analysis, for actively constructing categories from data, and for spurring more methodological plurality within qualitative theory building.

Cite this

Stine Grodal, Michel Anteby, Audrey L. Holm (2020). Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3682667

@article{stine2020achieving,
  title  = {Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building},
  author = {Grodal, Stine and Anteby, Michel and Holm, Audrey L.},
  year   = {2020},
  journal = {Academy of Management Review},
  doi    = {10.2139/ssrn.3682667}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 644 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by