SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preprint servers: a ‘rush to publish’ or ‘just in time delivery’ for science?
7 references·6 citing·47 second hop
Preprint servers: a ‘rush to publish’ or ‘just in time delivery’ for science? (2020)Preprint servers: a ‘rush to publish’ or …Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Systematic examination of pre…Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (2020)Early in the epidemic: impact…Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Tracking the popularity and o…Peer review and publication delay (2019)Peer review and publication d…New preprint server for medical research (2019)New preprint server for medic…The Rush to Publication (2017)The Rush to PublicationMeasuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Counterpoint: Preprints and the Future of Scientific Publishing—In Favor of Relevance (2023)Counterpoint: Preprints and t…Can open peer review improve uptake of preprints into policies? Evidence from a causal inference (2023)Can open peer review improve …Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals (2022)Reliability of citations of m…Publication practices during the COVID ‐19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect? (2022)Publication practices during …Gender Balance and Readability of COVID-19 Scientific Publishing: A Quantitative Analysis of 90,000 Preprint Manuscripts (2021)Gender Balance and Readabilit…A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2021)A bibliometric analysis of CO…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Museum Activism (2019)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature (2020)Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (2020)Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles (2022)Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication (2017)The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship (2020)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics (2020)Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv (2020)Publication rate and citation counts for preprints released during the COVID-19 pandemic: the good, the bad and the ugly (2021)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study (2020)Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation (2021)Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors (2022)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers (2021)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)A bibliometric study of article retractions in technology fields in developing economies countries (2023)Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study (2023)Peer review: the attitudes and behaviours of Covid-19 pandemic-era early career researchers (2023)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Key challenges in epidemiology: embracing open science (2024)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets (2021)COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
  • 2019Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints196 cited
  • 2020Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility196 cited
  • 2020Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting112 cited
  • 2019New preprint server for medical research67 cited
  • 2017The Rush to Publication45 cited
  • 2019Peer review and publication delay37 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Publication practices during the COVID ‐19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?17 cited
  • 2022Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals15 cited
  • 2021A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean14 cited
  • 2023Can open peer review improve uptake of preprints into policies? Evidence from a causal inference6 cited
  • 2021Gender Balance and Readability of COVID-19 Scientific Publishing: A Quantitative Analysis of 90,000 Preprint Manuscripts6 cited
  • 2023Counterpoint: Preprints and the Future of Scientific Publishing—In Favor of Relevance5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work