Characteristics of Faculty Accused of Academic Sexual Misconduct in the Biomedical and Health Sciences

Magdalena Espinoza · David Hsiehchen

22 citations0/0 files storedJAMA

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies Academic integrity and plagiarism Diversity and Career in Medicine

Abstract

This study uses internet search data to identify and characterize biomedical and health sciences faculty at US higher education institutions who had sexual misconduct accusations against them between 1982 and 2019 that led to institutional or legal actions proving or supporting guilt.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

References

2018Sexual Harassment of Women 2016Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty 2018Prevalence of Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine 2019Sexual Harassment of Canadian Medical Students: A National Survey

Cited by

2022Sexual misconduct in medicine must end 2021Sexual Harassment Experiences Across the Academic Medicine Hierarchy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.