A dimensional taxonomy of perceived characteristics of major life events.

Maike Luhmann · Ina Faßbender · Peter Haehner

168 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality and Social Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Resilience and Mental Health Identity, Memory, and Therapy

Abstract

Major life events (MLEs) are studied in many different areas in psychology such as personality development, clinical psychology, or posttraumatic growth. In all of these areas, a common finding is that MLEs differ in their effects on psychological outcomes. However, a framework that allows a systematic examination of these differences is still absent. This article presents a systematic literature review and 4 empirical studies (Ns between 226 and 449, total N = 1,477) in which we developed and evaluated a dimensional taxonomy of 9 perceived characteristics of MLEs: valence, impact, predictability, challenge, emotional significance, change in worldviews, social status changes, external control, and extraordinariness. These event characteristics can be measured reliably with the Event Characteristics Questionnaire (ECQ). Perceived event characteristics predicted individual differences in changes in subjective well-being in both retrospective and longitudinal data after MLEs over and above established predictors of subjective well-being such as personality and demographic characteristics. A comparison between the ECQ and established taxonomies of situation characteristics such as the DIAMONDS (Rauthmann et al., 2014) showed high conceptual and empirical convergence between some ECQ subscales (e.g., valence, challenge) with characteristics of situations, whereas other ECQ subscales (e.g., social status changes, external control) were conceptually and empirically distinct from situation characteristics. In sum, including measures of perceived event characteristics in studies on MLEs may enhance our understanding of why MLEs differ in the direction, strength, and duration of their effects on psychological outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 168 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2021Personality Trait Stability and Change 2023Life Events and Personality Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2021Capturing interactions, correlations, fits, and transactions: A Person-Environment Relations Model 2022Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework 2024Psychological well-being in Europe after the outbreak of war in Ukraine 2024The relationship between the perception of major life events and depression: A systematic scoping review and meta-analysis 2021Significant Life Events and Career Sustainability: A Three-Wave Study 2023Private Life Events as Antecedents for Public Employees’ Engagement and Burnout

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.