SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
4 references·3 citing·26 second hop
A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2020)A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated…Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2019)Still moving toward automatio…A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)A question of trust: can we b…Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Moving toward the automation …Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…A4SLR: An Agentic Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Health Technology Assessment (2025)A4SLR: An Agentic Artificial …Large language models, updates, and evaluation of automation tools for systematic reviews: a summary of significant discussions at the eighth meeting of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2024)Large language models, update…Evaluation of publication type tagging as a strategy to screen randomized controlled trial articles in preparing systematic reviews (2022)Evaluation of publication typ…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A topography of climate change research (2020)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory (2020)Self-Efficacy Interventions (2020)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Diffusion of innovations (2003)An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes (2020)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine (2020)Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare (2013)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews (2020)Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? (2023)Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assisting Systematic Review Process in Health Research: A Systematic Review (2025)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow (2021)The Impact of Systematic Review Automation Tools on Methodological Quality and Time Taken to Complete Systematic Review Tasks: Case Study (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2019A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?167 cited
  • 2019Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)110 cited
  • 2018Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)68 cited

Cited by

  • 2025A4SLR: An Agentic Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Health Technology Assessment22 cited
  • 2024Large language models, updates, and evaluation of automation tools for systematic reviews: a summary of significant discussions at the eighth meeting of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)21 cited
  • 2022Evaluation of publication type tagging as a strategy to screen randomized controlled trial articles in preparing systematic reviews15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work