Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

Erik B von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart Pocock, Peter Christian Gøtzsche, Jan Paul Vandenbroucke

2007-10-18articleBMJ10,709 citationsbronze

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

Poor reporting of research hampers assessment and makes it less useful. An international group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studies

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10,709 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

Cited by

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research

2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration

2019The STROBE guidelines

2021Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization

2021Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement

2015Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement