SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles
13 references·0 citing·52 second hopsampled
Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles (2020)Analysis of articles directly related to …Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis (2017)Study-based registers of rand…Public availability of trial protocols (2017)Public availability of trial …Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) (2017)Practical guidance for using …Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Primary Outcomes in Protocols and Publications (2017)Association of Trial Registra…A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)A systematic review of the pr…Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications (2016)Randomized trials are frequen…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence (2014)Linked publications from a si…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials (2013)Poor description of non-pharm…Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials (2013)Linking ClinicalTrials.gov an…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs (2017)The significance of the trial outcome was associated with publication rate and time to publication (2017)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study (2016)Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions (2017)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (2017)A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses (2023)Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study (2024)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) (2019)SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Overstating the evidence – double counting in meta-analysis and related problems (2009)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Reproducibility and replicability of systematic reviews (2019)Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s Study-Based Register of Randomized Controlled Trials: Development and Content Analysis (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study (2022)Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2013Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials374 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing114 cited
  • 2017Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)113 cited
  • 2017Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis107 cited
  • 2013Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials90 cited
  • 2017Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Primary Outcomes in Protocols and Publications77 cited
  • 2017A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results47 cited
  • 2016Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications32 cited
  • 2014Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence24 cited
  • 2017Public availability of trial protocols18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.