SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Checklists to detect potential predatory …Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)The false academy: predatory …PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science (2016)Languages Are Still a Major B…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? (2000)When choice is demotivating: …When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? (2000)When choice is demotivating: …Retracted papers originating from paper mills: a cross-sectional analysis of references and citations (2024)Retracted papers originating …Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review (2024)Predatory publishing in medic…Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis (2024)Can ChatGPT identify predator…Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Cabells' Predatory Reports cr…Medical Resident Awareness of Predatory Journal Practices in an International Medical Education System (2022)Medical Resident Awareness of…A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing (2022)A psychological perspective t…Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers (2021)Should I include studies from…Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Journal citation reports and …Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews (2021)Dealing with predatory journa…An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)An integrated paradigm shift …A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)A credit-like rating system t…“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward (2021)“Evidence-based checklists” f…How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)How reliable and useful is Ca…Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2020)Defining predatory journals a…Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals (2020)Citation contagion: a citatio…Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? (2017)Predatory Journals Spamming f…A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. (1966)Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985)A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. (2003)Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field (2009)Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. (2002)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2000When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?2,885 cited
  • 2000When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?2,564 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2016Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science602 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
156 cited
  • 2016The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics155 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)172 cited
    • 2020Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process104 cited
    • 2017Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?93 cited
    • 2021Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews71 cited
    • 2021An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’47 cited
    • 2021Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers44 cited
    • 2020How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis41 cited
    • 2023Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions35 cited
    • 2024Retracted papers originating from paper mills: a cross-sectional analysis of references and citations35 cited
    • 2022A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing34 cited
    • 2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
    • 2020Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals27 cited
    • 2021“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward24 cited
    • 2022Medical Resident Awareness of Predatory Journal Practices in an International Medical Education System24 cited
    • 2024Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review24 cited
    • 2024Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis23 cited