The bones are the same: an exploratory analysis of authentic communication with LGBTQ publics

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this work is to identify the components of authentic communication with LGBTQ publics and to examine if there is a difference in what constitutes authentic communication for LGBTQ publics compared to other publics. Design/methodology/approach We conducted in-depth interviews with professionals who both identify as LGBTQ and are instrumental in developing content targeted to this public. Findings Authenticity is synonymous regardless of the target public; however, differences emerge in the manifestation of authenticity with historically marginalized groups, like LGBTQ publics. Practical implications Practitioners working with historically marginalized communities need to make sure they are walking the walk, not just talking the talk. Social implications Authentic communication arises from an organization's broader holistic commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion. Originality/value The insights derived by our participants are unique, as they are perspectives traditionally “written out” of research.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.