Article2020

Optimizing good Corporate Governance Mechanism to Improve Performance: Case in Indonesia’s Manufacturing Companies

Ilham Hidayah Napitupulu · Anggiat Situngkir · Ferry Hendro Basuki · Widyo Nugroho

35 citations0/0 files storedGlobal Business Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Governance and Financial Management Corporate Finance and Governance Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Abstract

The application of good corporate governance (GCG) aims to improve company performance. In implementing GCG, a mechanism is needed, namely a procedure and a clear relationship between the decision-maker and the party overseeing the decision. The mechanism of GCG can be measured by the numbers of board of directors, independent board of commissioners, audit committees, and also managerial ownership. This research is conducted at manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, with a total sample of 52 companies determined by purposive sampling technique. Data are analyzed by using multiple regression analysis with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) tools. The findings show that the board of directors and independent commissioners have an influence on company performance, while audit committees and managerial ownership do not affect the company’s performance. The company’s performance is improved by the existence of an independent board of commissioners that provides guidance and direction as well as supervision to the company management. Meanwhile, the audit committee has no influence, because the audit committee is only responsible for assisting the board of commissioners in monitoring the financial reporting process by the management to improve the credibility of financial statements, and managerial ownership does not affect the company’s performance because the number of management shares is quite low, because of which the management cannot influence the decisions taken at the general meeting of shareholders to improve the company’s financial performance. Thus, if the GCG mechanism goes well, then the company’s performance will increase.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 2016Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance 2012Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide 2003Effect of Corporate Governance on Bond Ratings and Yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors*2021ANALISIS LAPORAN KEUANGAN 2011Corporate Governance and Performance in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Evidence from US Commercial Banks 2014Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model 2007The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.