SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Strengthening literature search strategies for systematic reviews reporting population health in the Middle East and North Africa: A meta‐research study
16 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Strengthening literature search strategies for systematic reviews reporting population health in the Middle East and North Africa: A meta‐research study (2020)Strengthening literature search strategie…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date (2019)More systematic reviews were …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2018)The Joint United Nations Prog…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Grey literature in systematic…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility (2013)PROSPERO at one year: an eval…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Writing a narrative biomedica…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies (2006)Country development and manus…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The global impact of HIV/AIDS (2001)Living on the Extreme Margin: Social Exclusion of the Transgender Population (Hijra) in Bangladesh (2009)The effects of educational curricula and training on LGBT‐specific health issues for healthcare students and professionals: a mixed‐method systematic review (2017)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2018The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS1,951 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2011Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors800 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
  • 2017Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

325 cited
  • 2013PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility188 cited
  • 2006Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies107 cited
  • 2019More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date53 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.