From the Puritans to the projects: public housing and public neighbors

Abstract

From Puritans to Projects: Public Housing and Public Neighbors. By Lawrence J. Vale. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. 482 pages. $22.50 (paperback). The question of class inequality has always been hotly contested terrain, occupied on one side by those who demand corrective government intervention and, on other, by those who maintain that intervention itself is problem. Far beyond realm of academic questions of justice and fairness, however, lie harsh reminders that inequality endures, despite well-intentioned efforts of our best citizens and elected representatives. Perhaps most visible and striking reminders are high-rise housing projects of American cities. In From Puritans to Projects, Lawrence Vale attempts to explain how the projects became most vilified domestic environment in United States and why their residents came to carry such a broadly shared stigma (v). In so doing, Vale, a Professor of Urban Studies and Planning at MIT, brings an architectural sensibility to bear on his more than twenty years of research into historical roots of public housing. The result is an illuminating study that exposes some of enduring antinomies of American social welfare policy. For example, while public housing has often been at center of contentious debate in American politics, officials and citizens alike have also agreed that they have a duty to care for their public neighbors (Vale's term for those who cannot meet their community's socioeconomic standards). It is Vale's signal accomplishment as a historian to explore historical roots of this ambivalence, arguing that troubled housing projects of today can be better understood if they are seen as having grown out of cultural context of Puritan America. Although nominally national in scope, emphasis throughout this book is on city of Boston, whose long history affords a rare opportunity to explore complete development of public housing in one place (9). One recurring theme in this narrative is need to distinguish between deserving and undeserving segments of poor. This is evident when, in seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, it was up to Massachusetts town selectmen to distribute aid to paupers. If applicants were judged to be poor through no fault of their own, they received aid or outdoor relief while staying at home. If instead they were seen as mad, immoral, or simply lazy, they would receive indoor relief, which meant being forced to take up residence in an almshouse. …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.