Underwriter reputation and IPO valuation in an emerging market: evidence from Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of underwriter reputation on the valuation of Malaysian initial public offerings (IPOs). Design/methodology/approach This study employed cross-sectional multiple regression models to analyse the relationship between underwriter reputation and IPO valuation that included 466 IPOs listed on Bursa Malaysia from 2000 to 2017. Findings The results revealed that underwriter reputation had a significant negative association with IPO valuation. Firms that engaged the services of reputable underwriters had their IPO offer prices set lower than the intrinsic values during the listing. After incorporating firms' size, this study found a positive relationship between underwriter reputation and IPO valuation. Big firms (high quality) hired reputable underwriters for certification purposes as issuers were aware that the cost of hiring a reputable underwriter would be justified by increased transparency after listing. Therefore, firms that engaged reputable underwriters had approximately fair values since issuers assumed that the price would be close to the intrinsic value following enhanced transparency post-listing. Research limitations/implications Future studies should focus on other non-financial factors, such as auditor reputation. Originality/value The present study provides new insights into the certification role of underwriters in valuing IPOs in the Malaysian market.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.