Maximizing the Impact of Cognitive Engagement Interventions for Older Adults

Abstract

In the past few decades, there has been a surge of research on cognitive interventions to increase cognitive abilities in older adults, many of whom experience age-related cognitive and functional declines. It has become increasingly clear that although cognitive interventions with older adults can increase cognitive abilities that are directly targeted in the training program, increasing untrained cognitive abilities and abilities related to daily life activities has not been as effective as originally anticipated. Instead of taking a pessimistic view that it is impossible to substantially increase cognitive and functional abilities across a variety of domains in older adults, we propose that cognitive interventions could benefit from developing theory-driven research programs, especially by incorporating findings from earlier in the life span and models of behavior change, to optimize intervention gains in later adulthood. Moreover, intervention gains can also be increased by taking into consideration participant characteristics, situations, and preferences when designing interventions. Instead of considering these factors as “noise,” they provide meaningful information about differences in individual experiences in the past, present, and future. This chapter focuses mostly on cognitive engagement interventions, which are holistic interventions employing real-world skills and tasks. After briefly reviewing the current state of the literature, we discuss ways in which researchers have begun to investigate how to maximize the impact of engagement interventions on cognitive abilities and functional independence (i.e., the ability to perform daily activities independently). In addition, we consider unique cognitive, social, and environmental aspects of the older adult that can be leveraged for maximizing the impact of cognitive engagement interventions.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.