SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
High-profile coronavirus retractions raise concerns about data oversight
0 references·16 citing·55 second hop
High-profile coronavirus retractions raise concerns about data oversight (2020)High-profile coronavirus retractions rais…Retracted Covid-19 articles: significantly more cited than other articles within their journal of origin (2023)Retracted Covid-19 articles: …Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews (2023)Relationship between journal …An implementation framework to improve the transparency and reproducibility of computational models of infectious diseases (2023)An implementation framework t…A classification system for characterizing the integrity and quality of evidence in risk studies (2023)A classification system for c…Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials (2022)Transparency and reporting ch…The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing (2022)The editor: A demanding but u…Ten simple rules for good research practice (2022)Ten simple rules for good res…Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Retracted publications in pha…Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length (2022)Journal and disciplinary vari…Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late! (2022)Correction of scientific lite…The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)The rapid, massive growth of …The New Common (2021)The New CommonScience integrity has been never more important: It's all about trust (2021)Science integrity has been ne…Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice (2021)Inconsistent and incomplete r…Science at Warp Speed: Medical Research, Publication, and Translation During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)Science at Warp Speed: Medica…Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them (2020)Frauds in scientific research…Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer review in health sciences (2002)Against pandemic research exceptionalism (2020)The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Scientific Publishing (2021)A theory of human motivation. (1943)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)Parenting adolescents in times of a pandemic: Changes in relationship quality, autonomy support, and parental control? (2021)Drill rap and dignity (2023)Problematizing cultural difference: YouTube narratives about COVID-19 by South Korean and American Vloggers (2023)TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions (1999)How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed (2011)Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent (2011)Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence (2021)Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers (2022)Semi-Automatic Systematic Literature Reviews and Information Extraction of COVID-19 Scientific Evidence: Description and Preliminary Results of the COKE Project (2022)How to fight an infodemic (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)The COVID-19 social media infodemic (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite (2022)A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19 (2023)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored (2023)Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms (2011)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)Sneaked references: Fabricated reference metadata distort citation counts (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)A scoping review establishes need for consensus guidance on reporting health equity in observational studies (2023)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Toward open science in marketing research (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study (2023)No evidence of important difference in summary treatment effects between COVID-19 preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study (2023)Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles of COVID-19 trials (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data (2018)Prevalence of Short Peer Reviews in 3 Leading General Medical Journals (2023)Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey (2025)Limitations of Academic Bibliometric Indices: The Need for More Comprehensive Metrics (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature107 cited
  • 2021The New Common51 cited
  • 2021Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice48 cited
  • 2020Science at Warp Speed: Medical Research, Publication, and Translation During the COVID-19 Pandemic47 cited
  • 2022Ten simple rules for good research practice47 cited
  • 2022Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!46 cited
  • 2023Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews43 cited
  • 2020Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them38 cited
  • 2022Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews34 cited
  • 2022Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials25 cited
  • 2023Retracted Covid-19 articles: significantly more cited than other articles within their journal of origin24 cited
  • 2022Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length21 cited
  • 2021Science integrity has been never more important: It's all about trust20 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A classification system for characterizing the integrity and quality of evidence in risk studies
18 cited
  • 2022The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing17 cited
  • 2023An implementation framework to improve the transparency and reproducibility of computational models of infectious diseases16 cited