SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews
14 references·5 citing·52 second hop
How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews (2020)How do Cochrane authors conduct web searc…Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Searching for and selecting s…A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches (2017)A rapid method to increase tr…A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review (2017)A comparison of results of em…Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly (2016)Interventions for preventing …Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? (2016)Exploring issues in the condu…Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme (2015)Web searching for systematic …The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Applying systematic review se…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Google Scholar is not enough …Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Publish or Perish (2007)Publish or PerishGoing, Going, Still There: Using the WebCite Service to Permanently Archive Cited Web Pages (2005)Going, Going, Still There: Us…Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews (2001)Evaluation of the usefulness …Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approa…Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence? (2022)Efficient searching for NICE …What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study (2021)What you see depends on where…Gray Literature in Evaluating Effectiveness in Digital Health and Health and Welfare Technology: A Source Worth Considering (2021)Gray Literature in Evaluating…An alternative screening approach for Google Search identifies an accurate and manageable number of results for a systematic review (case study) (2021)An alternative screening appr…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Prevalence of elder abuse among community‐dwelling older adults in Turkey and its associated factors (2019)Review of Programs to Combat Elder Mistreatment: Focus on Hospitals and Level of Resources Needed (2019)Factors associated with staff-to-resident abuse in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional exploratory study (2021)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar (2007)Web 2.0 for Health Promotion: Reviewing the Current Evidence (2012)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)On the Effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction (2014)25 years of ‘sustainable projects’. What we know and what the literature says (2019)State of Research on Gamification in Education: A Bibliometric Survey (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)The Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Its Implications for the Global Food Supply Chains (2022)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility (2018)Software support for environmental evidence synthesis (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews (2022)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices (2024)Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS statement (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2022)Educating English Language Learners (2006)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Design-Based Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2015Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada958 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2007Publish or Perish728 cited
  • 2019Searching for and selecting studies643 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews186 cited
  • 2016Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly144 cited
  • 2017A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review137 cited
  • 2017A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches129 cited
  • 2016Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic?121 cited
  • 2005Going, Going, Still There: Using the WebCite Service to Permanently Archive Cited Web Pages57 cited
  • 2015Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme57 cited
  • 2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews
53 cited

Cited by

  • 2021What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study29 cited
  • 2021Gray Literature in Evaluating Effectiveness in Digital Health and Health and Welfare Technology: A Source Worth Considering29 cited
  • 2023Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper18 cited
  • 2021An alternative screening approach for Google Search identifies an accurate and manageable number of results for a systematic review (case study)16 cited
  • 2022Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?13 cited