SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Empirically generated reference proportions for baseline p values from rounded summary statistics
3 references·8 citing·31 second hop
Empirically generated reference proportions for baseline p values from rounded summary statistics (2020)Empirically generated reference proportio…Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Data fabrication and other re…Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Systematic review and statist…The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)The analysis of 168 randomise…Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? (2024)Publication integrity: what i…Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Integrity of randomized clini…Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity (2022)Procrastination and inconsist…Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns (2022)Distributions of baseline cat…Identical summary statistics were uncommon in randomized trials and cohort studies (2021)Identical summary statistics …Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Assessing Research Misconduct…Participant withdrawals were unusually distributed in randomized trials with integrity concerns: a statistical investigation (2020)Participant withdrawals were …Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrity (2020)Clinical trial registry docum…Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences (2007)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem (2021)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)Data quality assessment of interventional trials in public trial databases (2024)Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project (2024)Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel (2012)How to improve assessments of publication integrity (2024)Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group (2025)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think (2021)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Health Measurement Scales (2014)Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer (2018)How should we assess trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials? (2025)Investigating the trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials in osteopathic research: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2025)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)Just Post It (2013)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity254 cited
  • 2017Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals229 cited
  • 2016Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials108 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials37 cited
  • 2024Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?25 cited
  • 2023Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment20 cited
  • 2020Participant withdrawals were unusually distributed in randomized trials with integrity concerns: a statistical investigation17 cited
  • 2021Identical summary statistics were uncommon in randomized trials and cohort studies14 cited
  • 2022Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns13 cited
  • 2020Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrity12 cited
  • 2022Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work