SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials
16 references·0 citing·46 second hopsampled
Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials (2020)Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of …Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)Evolution of poor reporting a…Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture combined with another treatment for stroke (2017)Assessing the quality of repo…Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends (2016)Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Ch…Risk of bias of randomized trials over time (2015)Risk of bias of randomized tr…Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines (2014)Assessment of the quality of …Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA (2013)Quality of reporting and its …Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews (2013)Can trial quality be reliably…Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews: The why is Easy, the how is a Challenge (2013)Assessing Risk of Bias in Ran…GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating t…Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: Challenges and recommendations (2011)Assessing blinding in randomi…Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Revised STandards for Reporti…Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument (2010)Randomized Controlled Trials …A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)A Systematic Evaluation of th…The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture (2001)The methodological quality of…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines (2019)A methodological review revealed that reporting of trials in manual therapy has not improved over time (2020)PRIRATE 2020 guidelines for reporting randomized trials in Endodontics: explanation and elaboration (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions (2015)Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist (2019)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Yoga as a therapeutic intervention: a bibliometric analysis of published research studies. (2004)The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China (2007)Clinical Trials of Meditation Practices in Health Care: Characteristics and Quality (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. (1999)The Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT on Reporting of Randomised Control Trials of Acupuncture: A Systematic Methodological Evaluation (2018)Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture (2019)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi (2024)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension (2020)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials (2016)Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement1,391 cited
  • 2001The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture186 cited
  • 2017Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study170 cited
  • 2008A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials145 cited
  • 2016Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends61 cited
  • 2013Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews: The why is Easy, the how is a Challenge50 cited
  • 2014Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines49 cited
  • 2013Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews48 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010
Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument
46 cited
  • 2015Risk of bias of randomized trials over time34 cited
  • 2013Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA33 cited
  • 2011Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: Challenges and recommendations30 cited
  • 2017Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture combined with another treatment for stroke28 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.