SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities (2020)Quality of reporting for randomised clini…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 explanation and …The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasEmpirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasA method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Handbook of research on teaching (1986)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1994)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict (2014)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Attention Restoration Theory II: a systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments (2018)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias7,306 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,356 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,207 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,172 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

628 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence608 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.