Global research trends in complex oral sensitivity disorder: A systematic bibliometric analysis of the framework

Giulio Fortuna · Massimo Aria · Carmela Iorio · Michele Davide Mignogna · Gary D. Klasser

20 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Oral Pathology and Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Oral Health Pathology and Treatment Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A systematic bibliometric analysis was performed to investigate trends in complex oral sensitivity disorder (COSD) research worldwide and compare the contributions of different countries/institutions, scientific journals, authors, keywords, and citations. METHODS: Web of Science database from 1985 to 2018 was systematically searched to identify all relevant articles using the MeSH terms "complex oral sensitivity disorder" and all synonyms used in the literature. We included original articles, review articles, letters to the editor, and book chapters in the English language and in 27 different ISI categories of medical sciences. Several bibliometric indicators were used. RESULTS: We identified 10 633 articles, of which only 3349 were eligible with only 443 being included for quantitative analyses. The annual percentage growth rate for article publication was 9.16 fractionalized articles with the most productive countries (reported only in 428 out of 443 articles) being Italy (n = 66, 15.42%) followed by USA (n = 61, 14.25%) and with Italy achieving the greatest number of citations (n = 1415). Similarly, the most productive institution for article publication was the University of Turku, Finland, with 39 (8.8%) published articles. Among the top 20 departments, 15 were affiliated with dental institutions. The most productive source was "Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine" with 38 (8.58%) articles, whereas the most productive author was "Lopez-Jornet P" with 19 articles (6.52 fractionalized articles). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend for publications on COSD. Collaboration among different countries must improve in order to implement research on this disorder, which seems to be mainly a condition for the dental discipline.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses 2015The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?2006Theory and practise of the g-index

Cited by

2022Oral cancer research in Taiwan and mainland China: Scientometric analysis with emphasis on distinctive characteristics 2023A bibliometric analysis of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology: Fifty years of publications 2021A bibliometric analysis of top 100 most-cited articles in dentistry with author(s) affiliated with Taiwan institutes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.