SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The author–reviewer game
15 references·1 citing·54 second hop
The author–reviewer game (2020)The author–reviewer gameHow do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management (2020)How do journals of different …Confirmatory bias in peer review (2020)Confirmatory bias in peer rev…The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures (2018)The peer review game: an agen…Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers (2016)Quantity and/or Quality? The …The author–editor game (2015)The author–editor gameRewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication (2015)Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Ma…Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data (2015)Complex systems approach to s…Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review: An Agent-Based Model of Scientist Behaviour (2013)Opening the Black-Box of Peer…Salesforce Compensation with Inventory Considerations (2012)Salesforce Compensation with …Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewPeer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average (2011)Peer-review in a world with r…Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding (2011)Peer Review, Program Officers…Edifying Editing (2010)Edifying EditingScientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories (2008)Scientific Peer Review: An Ana…Sense about science (2006)Sense about scienceIs peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts? (2023)Is peer review duration short…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Foundations of social theory (1990)The Selection of Scientific Talent in the Allocation of Research Grants (2012)Collaborative Peer-Supported Review of Teaching (2013)Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (2016)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)National Science Board (1952)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy (1992)Quantifying the Volunteer Effort of Scientific Peer Reviewing (2011)Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism (2014)Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers (2015)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Ranking Games (2014)Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (2017)Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication (2017)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations (2017)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading (2023)Little Science, Big Science (1963)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact (2016)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)GLOFs in the WOS: bibliometrics, geographies and global trends of research on glacial lake outburst floods (Web of Science, 1979–2016) (2018)Out of Africa: The underrepresentation of African authors in high-impact geoscience literature (2020)The Logic of Collective Action (1965)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. (1966)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)A scoping review of simulation models of peer review (2019)The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal (2019)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals (2022)The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review (2022)Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)Moral Hazard and Observability (1979)The Provision of Incentives in Firms (1999)Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts (2003)Confidence Intervals for Data-Driven Inventory Policies with Demand Censoring (2020)Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations (2020)Contracting, Pricing, and Data Collection Under the AI Flywheel Effect (2022)Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals (2017)On Performance of Peer Review for Academic Journals: Analysis Based on Distributed Parallel System (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 2016Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers146 cited
  • 2015Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication89 cited
  • 2012Salesforce Compensation with Inventory Considerations89 cited
  • 2011Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average83 cited
  • 2008Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories53 cited
  • 2018The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures53 cited
  • 2013Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review: An Agent-Based Model of Scientist Behaviour44 cited
  • 2020How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management40 cited
  • 2011Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding35 cited
  • 2015Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data34 cited
  • 2015The author–editor game30 cited
  • 2006Sense about science30 cited
  • 2020Confirmatory bias in peer review30 cited
  • 2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Edifying Editing
28 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?10 cited