Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How fair can we go in machine learning ? Assessing the boundaries of accuracy and fairness

13 references·2 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2019Model Cards for Model Reporting2,653 cited
2017Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments2,157 cited
2019Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems1,621 cited
2020Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey1,040 cited
2018'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'690 cited
2017Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact630 cited
2019A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning601 cited
2010Discrimination Aware Decision Tree Learning303 cited
2020An Intersectional Definition of Fairness200 cited
2019What Does It Mean to ‘Solve’ the Problem of Discrimination in Hiring?197 cited
2019Fairness Constraints: A Flexible Approach for Fair Classification184 cited
2019Measuring Algorithmic Fairness104 cited
2020Fair classification and social welfare75 cited

Cited by

2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifiers44 cited
2022Bias Reducing Multitask Learning on Mental Health Prediction18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work