Quality Reference in Consumer Product Recalls

Abstract

ABSTRACT Product recalls are often associated with quality failures and may negatively affect customer satisfaction and firm performance. Motivated by counterintuitive anecdotal evidence on the positive relationship between recalls and sales, we develop an endogenous consumer reference model with stochastic quality levels and consumer valuation of gain‐loss utility to examine the consumer's willingness to buy in the event of a recall. A consumer makes purchasing decisions by evaluating gain‐loss values against a quality reference point. The theory of endogenous reference points incorporates the consumer's expectations of buying into forming a reference point based on the consumer's beliefs about quality outcomes (Kőszegi & Rabin, 2006, 2007). The uncertainty of the consumer's quality expectations combined with the consumer's personal equilibrium makes the reference point endogenous, generating predictions different from those under conventional exogenous reference point and in the case of deterministic quality expectations. We find that a product recall may revise the consumer's belief toward a more negative quality outcome, and therefore, a lower reference point, when quality expectations are uncertain and the consumer's reference point is endogenous. The consumer expects a greater gain from buying the product against the lower reference point, leading to a higher willingness to buy. In addition, we find that supply chain offshoring, which may be associated with consumer evaluation of gain‐loss utility or consumer loss aversion, may complicate the effect of recalls on a consumer's willingness to buy. These results suggest that firms should consider consumer preferences under uncertainty when designing and developing their global supply chain strategies in quality management.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.