SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review of the use of “magnitude-based inference” in sports science and medicine
15 references·5 citing·36 second hop
Systematic review of the use of “magnitude-based inference” in sports science and medicine (2020)Systematic review of the use of “magnitud…Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices (2020)Moving Sport and Exercise Sci…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Inferential Statistics as Des…Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p -Value Ban (2019)Assessing the Statistical Ana…Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods (2016)Error Rates, Decisive Outcome…CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: exten…CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: exten…Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing (2015)Registered Reports: Realignin…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes (2006)Making Meaningful Inferences …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Wish List for Improving the Quality of Statistics in Sport Science (2022)Wish List for Improving the Q…Perceptual-Motor and Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Acquisition in Soccer: A Systematic Review on the Influence of Practice Design and Coaching Behavior (2021)Perceptual-Motor and Perceptu…A Systems Analysis Critique of Sport-Science Research (2021)A Systems Analysis Critique o…Recommendations for statistical analysis involving null hypothesis significance testing (2020)Recommendations for statistic…Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research (2020)Improving open and rigorous s…G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)Medicine & science in sports & exercise (1994)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Physical and Physiological Profiles of Taekwondo Athletes (2014)How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods (2020)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies (2019)Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2016CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials3,394 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2016CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials2,841 cited
  • 2006Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes2,185 cited
  • 2019Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication427 cited
  • 2015Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing173 cited
  • 2020Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices115 cited
  • 2016Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods106 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p -Value Ban
71 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Perceptual-Motor and Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Acquisition in Soccer: A Systematic Review on the Influence of Practice Design and Coaching Behavior50 cited
  • 2020Recommendations for statistical analysis involving null hypothesis significance testing37 cited
  • 2022Wish List for Improving the Quality of Statistics in Sport Science32 cited
  • 2021A Systems Analysis Critique of Sport-Science Research26 cited
  • 2020Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research13 cited