Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An “alarming” and “exceptionally high” rate of COVID-19 retractions?

2 references·16 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2020Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat?156 cited
2018What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty'144 cited

Cited by

2024Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research58 cited
2022Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues54 cited
2021Let’s do better: public representations of COVID-19 science53 cited
2020Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature47 cited
2021Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers47 cited
2022Scientific publication speed and retractions of COVID-19 pandemic original articles34 cited
2022Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication29 cited
2021Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud?26 cited
2021Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals24 cited
2022Characteristics of Retracted Research Articles About COVID-19 vs Other Topics20 cited
2020An analysis of retractions in neurosurgery and allied clinical and basic science specialties19 cited
2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center

15 cited

2024Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research10 cited

2023Searching for evidence in public health emergencies: a white paper of best practices9 cited

2023Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research8 cited

2021The growth of COVID-19 scientific literature: A forecast analysis of different daily time series in specific settings8 cited