References

• 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
• 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
• 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
• 2007Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?2,524 cited
• 2001The Wage Penalty for Motherhood2,293 cited
• n.d.Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital2,050 cited
• 2013Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias913 cited
• 1998Understanding the ‘Family Gap’ in Pay for Women with Children868 cited
• 1989META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS: A QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF LITERATURE SURVEYS805 cited
• 2012Meta-Regression Analysis in Economics and Business798 cited
• 2013The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews672 cited
• 2007Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis650 cited
• 2017The Power of Bias in Economics Research634 cited
• 2007Meta‐Regression Methods for Detecting and Estimating Empirical Effects in the Presence of Publication Selection*605 cited
• 2009Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in britain, germany, and the united states