SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Current practice in systematic reviews including the ‘PICO for each synthesis’ and methods other than meta-analysis: protocol for a cross-sectional study
14 references·1 citing·43 second hopsampled
Current practice in systematic reviews including the ‘PICO for each synthesis’ and methods other than meta-analysis: protocol for a cross-sectional study (2020)Current practice in systematic reviews in…Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods (2019)Synthesizing and presenting f…Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions (2019)Synthesising quantitative evi…Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis (2019)Summarizing study characteris…Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address (2019)Determining the scope of the …Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Definition of a systematic re…Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis (2019)Defining the criteria for inc…Chapter 9: Summarizing the study characteristics and preparing for synthesis (2019)Chapter 9: Summarizing the st…Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews (2018)Lack of transparency in repor…Introduction to systematic reviews and meta‐analysis (2016)Introduction to systematic re…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions (2013)Introducing a series of metho…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots (2008)Reasons or excuses for avoidi…What is the next step of ICT development? The changes of ICT use in promoting elderly healthcare access: A systematic literature review (2024)What is the next step of ICT …The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis (2012)The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014)A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The critical interpretive synthesis: an assessment of reporting practices (2020)Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Implications of a complexity perspective for systematic reviews and guideline development in health decision making (2019)Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis (2020)Defining the determinants of vaccine uptake and undervaccination in migrant populations in Europe to improve routine and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a systematic review (2022)The prevalence and use of emerging technologies in STEAM education: A systematic review of the literature (2023)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic review of risk and protective factors for suicidal and self-harm behaviors among children and adolescents involved with cyberbullying (2021)How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies (2022)Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. (1998)Associations of screen time, sedentary time and physical activity with sleep in under 5s: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods (2020)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2008Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots457 cited
  • 2019Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods420 cited
  • 2019Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions319 cited
  • 2019Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis306 cited
  • 2019Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks241 cited
  • 2018Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews168 cited
  • 2019Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address163 cited
  • 2019Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis149 cited
  • 2016Introduction to systematic reviews and meta‐analysis101 cited
  • 2013Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions69 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Chapter 9: Summarizing the study characteristics and preparing for synthesis
53 cited

Cited by

  • 2024What is the next step of ICT development? The changes of ICT use in promoting elderly healthcare access: A systematic literature review10 cited