SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics and publication status of gastrointestinal endoscopy clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
5 references·0 citing·27 second hop
Characteristics and publication status of gastrointestinal endoscopy clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (2020)Characteristics and publication status of…Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2018 (2018)Burden and Cost of Gastrointe…Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Publication of NIH funded tri…Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Statistical Reviewers Improve…Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)Withholding Research Results …Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)University-Industry Research Relationships in Biotechnology: Implications for the University (1986)Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists (1989)Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences — An Industry Survey (1996)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship (2011)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Telemonitoring of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (TECCU): Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2019)Prevalence, risk factors and global impact of musculoskeletal injuries among endoscopists: a nationwide European study (2020)Internet Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 20181,643 cited
  • 1997Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science645 cited
  • 2012Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis378 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial115 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work