SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review
16 references·4 citing·42 second hop
Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review (2020)Outcome reporting recommendations for cli…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2019)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsPRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Guidelines for Inclusion of P…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Reporting of Patient-Reported…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research (2022)Selective outcome reporting i…High incidence of outcome switching observed in follow-up publications of randomized controlled trials: Meta-research study (2021)High incidence of outcome swi…Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement (2021)Evaluation of reporting quali…Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization (2020)Primary outcome reporting in …Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2019Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,217 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2013Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,384 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2018Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

813 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization33 cited
    • 2021Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement30 cited
    • 2022Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research13 cited
    • 2021High incidence of outcome switching observed in follow-up publications of randomized controlled trials: Meta-research study11 cited