Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Biased belief updating and suboptimal choice in foraging decisions

16 references·16 citing·50 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2007The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk1,733 cited
1970Economics of Information and Job Search1,249 cited
2011How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality729 cited
2011The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself666 cited
2015Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters345 cited
2008The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk239 cited
2011Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence224 cited
2015How Do College Students Respond to Public Information about Earnings?220 cited
2008Patch leaving in humans: can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches?144 cited
2016Optimistic update bias holds firm: Three tests of robustness following Shah et al.123 cited
2013Human development of the ability to learn from bad news119 cited
2018Updating Beliefs Under Perceived Threat109 cited
2013Subjective costs drive overly patient foraging strategies in rats on an intertemporal foraging task99 cited
2017Chronic and Acute Stress Promote Overexploitation in Serial Decision Making90 cited
2014Self‐specific Optimism Bias in Belief Updating Is Associated with High Trait Optimism

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

87 cited

2018Reference-point centering and range-adaptation enhance human reinforcement learning at the cost of irrational preferences79 cited

Cited by

2022Individuals with adverse childhood experiences explore less and underweight reward feedback68 cited
2023Effort Foraging Task reveals positive correlation between individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans47 cited
2023Overharvesting in human patch foraging reflects rational structure learning and adaptive planning40 cited
2022Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges39 cited
2021Control over patch encounters changes foraging behavior23 cited
2025Time Spent Thinking in Online Chess Reflects the Value of Computation18 cited
2021The exploration–exploitation dilemma in pain: an experimental investigation13 cited
2021Certainty and uncertainty of the future changes planning and sunk costs.10 cited
2021Choices favoring cognitive effort in a foraging environment decrease when multiple forms of effort and delay are interleaved7 cited
2024Foraging in a non-foraging task: Fitness maximization explains human risk preference dynamics under changing environment5 cited
2026Utilizing social foraging as a framework to study decisions in groups4 cited
2023Resource limitations: A taxonomy4 cited
2025Human foraging strategies flexibly adapt to resource distribution and time constraints3 cited
2021Control over patch encounters changes foraging behaviour3 cited
2021SalemGarcia_20213 cited
2025Blaming luck, claiming skill: Self-attribution bias in error assignment2 cited