SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation (2020)Methods used to assess outcome consistenc…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards fo…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)Meta-research: Evaluation and…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Choosing Important Health Out…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Using the Delphi Technique to…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (2010)Quality Control in Systematic…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Standardising outcomes for cl…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016)The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review (2017)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study (2020)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,006 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2011Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies891 cited
  • 2017Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations791 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2015Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices492 cited
  • 2007Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

482 cited
  • 2014Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review338 cited
  • 2010Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses324 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.