SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry
16 references·3 citing·44 second hop
Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2020)Extent and prevalence of spin in randomiz…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)‘Spin’ in published biomedica…Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention (2015)Classification and prevalence…Trap of trends to statistical significance: likelihood of near significant P value becoming more significant with extra data (2014)Trap of trends to statistical…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Impact of Spin in the Abstrac…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study (2012)Misrepresentation of Randomiz…Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond (2012)Improving the reporting of ra…Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Negative results are disappea…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence (2003)Effect of interpretive bias o…Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Dental Caries with Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes: A Methodological Study (2023)Assessment of Spin in the Abs…Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2022)Spin in the Abstracts of Rand…Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 (2021)Reporting, interpretation, an…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation (2002)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)Misinformation in and about science (2021)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Scientific Utopia (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses (2014)Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used (2018)An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services (2022)Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,041 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
  • 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
  • 2012Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study293 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

222 cited
  • 2015Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention137 cited
  • 2014Trap of trends to statistical significance: likelihood of near significant P value becoming more significant with extra data125 cited
  • 2012Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond118 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 202026 cited
    • 2022Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis14 cited
    • 2023Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Dental Caries with Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes: A Methodological Study12 cited