SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it
7 references·8 citing·52 second hop
The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it (2020)The best time to argue about what a repli…What is replication? (2020)What is replication?Adversarial alignment enables competing models to engage in cooperative theory building toward cumulative science (2020)Adversarial alignment enables…What’s next for Registered Reports? (2019)What’s next for Registered Re…Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right (2016)Scientists’ Reputations Are B…Registered Reports (2014)Registered ReportsAn open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014)An open investigation of the …Experiences of collaborative research. (2003)Experiences of collaborative …Effects of the Generic Masculine and Its Alternatives in Germanophone Countries: A Multi-Lab Replication and Extension of Stahlberg, Sczesny, and Braun (2001) (2024)Effects of the Generic Mascul…Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences (2023)Strategic ambiguity in the so…Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019 (2023)Epidemiological characteristi…Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences (2022)Strategic ambiguity in the so…Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines (2022)Sharing the Recipe: Reproduci…How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis (2022)How failure to falsify in hig…Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions? (2022)Establishing ground truth in …Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan (2017)Center for Open Science: Stra…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior (2002)Making replication mainstream (2017)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)False-Positive Psychology (2011)At what sample size do correlations stabilize? (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Misinformation in and about science (2021)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature (2016)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Scientific Utopia (2012)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting (2019)Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)The “replication crisis” in the public eye: Germans’ awareness and perceptions of the (ir)reproducibility of scientific research (2020)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture (2019)Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2020)Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021)Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in (1987)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)A Falsificationist Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses in Social and Behavioral Sciences: Systematic Replications Framework (2020)The social responsibility of organizations: Perceptions of organizational morality as a key mechanism explaining the relation between CSR activities and stakeholder support (2021)Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved (2023)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1976)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability (2020)Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Is Social Work Research in Crisis? (2023)Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey (2023)A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics (2025)Strong Inference (1964)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Hello World! Building computational models to represent social and organizational theory (2023)Improving statistical reporting in psychology (2025)Novelty, Consistency, Transparency: The Trilemma of Psychological Sciences and its Consequences on Open Science Practices (2025)Rewarding Research Transparency (2018)The New Worries about Science (2020)The Role of Clearinghouses in Promoting Transparent Research: A Methodological Study of Transparency Practices for Preventive Interventions (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Registered Reports716 cited
  • 2020What is replication?390 cited
  • 2014An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research311 cited
  • 2019What’s next for Registered Reports?154 cited
  • 2003Experiences of collaborative research.149 cited
  • 2016Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right67 cited
  • 2020Adversarial alignment enables competing models to engage in cooperative theory building toward cumulative science54 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences41 cited
  • 2023Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-201925 cited
  • 2017Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan24 cited
  • 2022How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis16 cited
  • 2022Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines14 cited
  • 2022Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences12 cited
  • 2024Effects of the Generic Masculine and Its Alternatives in Germanophone Countries: A Multi-Lab Replication and Extension of Stahlberg, Sczesny, and Braun (2001)12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2022
Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions?
8 cited