SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study
11 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study (2020)Using the Cochrane Central Register of Co…A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)A full systematic review was …Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …Studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov accounted for an increasing proportion of protocol registrations in medical research (2019)Studies registered in non-Cli…Trial registry searches for randomized controlled trials of new drugs required registry-specific adaptation to achieve adequate sensitivity (2017)Trial registry searches for r…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov …RReACT goes global: Perils and pitfalls of constructing a global open-access database of registered analgesic clinical trials and trial results (2014)RReACT goes global: Perils an…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…The number needed to read—a new measure of journal value (2005)The number needed to read—a n…From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration (2009)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration (2013)Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT) (2017)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov (2018)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Searching for Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)A technical review of three clinical trials register resources indicates where improvements to the search interfaces are needed (2021)Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses (2017)Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey (2018)Articles provided insufficient information to conduct an appropriate retrospective assessment of the pragmatic/explanatory features of medicine trials with the PRECIS-2 tool (2020)Characteristics and Research Waste Among Randomized Clinical Trials in Gastric Cancer (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT ‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages (2024)Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (2024)An experimental search strategy retrieves more precise results than PubMed and Google for questions about medical interventions (2015)Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? (2017)Publikationen aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum in Zeitschriften mit hohem Impact Factor: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Suchfilters (2018)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study685 cited
  • 2014Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?75 cited
  • 2019Studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov accounted for an increasing proportion of protocol registrations in medical research37 cited
  • 2005The number needed to read—a new measure of journal value21 cited
  • 2017Trial registry searches for randomized controlled trials of new drugs required registry-specific adaptation to achieve adequate sensitivity15 cited
  • 2014RReACT goes global: Perils and pitfalls of constructing a global open-access database of registered analgesic clinical trials and trial results14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work