SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high
16 references·9 citing·35 second hop
Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high (2020)Are questionable research practices facil…The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019)The association between adole…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)Investigating Variation in Re…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaMeasuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyHow Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Why Most Discovered True Asso…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyHARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research (2025)Estimating the Replicability …Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research (2023)Up Front and Open? Shrouded i…The bias for statistical significance in sport and exercise medicine (2023)The bias for statistical sign…Overcoming the “Ostrich Effect”: A Narrative Review on the Incentives and Consequences of Questionable Research Practices in Kinesiology (2023)Overcoming the “Ostrich Effec…Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study (2022)Reporting and transparent res…Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations (2022)Assessing Open Science practi…The Nature of Our Literature (2021)The Nature of Our LiteratureOpen Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition) (2020)Open Research: Examples of go…Most ankle sprain research is either false or clinically unimportant: A 30-year audit of randomized controlled trials (2020)Most ankle sprain research is…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The New Statistics (2013)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2019The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use1,490 cited
  • 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2014Investigating Variation in Replicability1,207 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research40 cited
    • 2021The Nature of Our Literature38 cited
    • 2023The bias for statistical significance in sport and exercise medicine32 cited
    • 2022Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study23 cited
    • 2020Most ankle sprain research is either false or clinically unimportant: A 30-year audit of randomized controlled trials18 cited
    • 2023Overcoming the “Ostrich Effect”: A Narrative Review on the Incentives and Consequences of Questionable Research Practices in Kinesiology17 cited
    • 2023Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research15 cited
    • 2022Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations15 cited
    • 2020Open Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition)8 cited