SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
6 references·16 citing·51 second hop
Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic (2020)Characteristics of scientific articles on…Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence (2019)Completing ‘Summary of findin…The pressure to publish pushes down quality (2016)The pressure to publish pushe…Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Using data sources beyond Pub…PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Tracking ChatGPT Research: Insights From the Literature and the Web (2024)Tracking ChatGPT Research: In…The impact of COVID-19 on global health journals: an analysis of impact factor and publication trends (2023)The impact of COVID-19 on glo…Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research (2023)Global Trends in Highly Cited…The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-19 (2022)The high scholarly value of g…COVID-19 article retractions in journals indexed in PubMed (2022)COVID-19 article retractions …Temporal evolution, most influential studies and sleeping beauties of the coronavirus literature (2021)Temporal evolution, most infl…Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics (2021)Research on Covid-19: a disru…Let’s do better: public representations of COVID-19 science (2021)Let’s do better: public repre…Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers (2021)Is rapid scientific publicati…How the scientific community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: A subject-level time-trend bibliometric analysis (2021)How the scientific community …Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research (2021)Evolution and structure of re…COVID-19 and diabetes: Analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus (2021)COVID-19 and diabetes: Analys…Academic Journal Retractions and the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021)Academic Journal Retractions …Publication Non Grata: The Challenge of Publishing Non-COVID-19 Research in the COVID Era (2020)Publication Non Grata: The Ch…Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature (2020)Optimizing peer review to min…Competing with a pandemic: Trends in research design in a time of Covid-19 (2020)Competing with a pandemic: Tr…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map (2018)Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review (2019)The Impact of COVID-19 School Closure on Child and Adolescent Health: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework (2020)Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review (2020)Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021)Mistrust in biomedical research and vaccine hesitancy: the forefront challenge in the battle against COVID-19 in Italy (2020)Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Assessing motivations and barriers to science outreach within academic science research settings: A mixed-methods survey (2022)Multiplicity and dynamics of social representations of the COVID-19 pandemic on Chinese social media from 2019 to 2020 (2022)Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints (2022)How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19 (2021)Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Retracted Articles on COVID-19 (2022)Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Evaluating Research Impact Based on Semantic Scholar Highly Influential Citations, Total Citations, and Altmetric Attention Scores: The Quest for Refined Measures Remains Illusive (2023)Interconnectedness between Supply Chain Resilience, Industry 4.0, and Investment (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996)Science of science (2018)How does the wealth level of nations affect their COVID-19 vaccination plans? (2023)General laws of funding for scientific citations: how citations change in funded and unfunded research between basic and applied sciences (2024)Research funding and citations in papers of Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine, 2019-2020 (2024)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Measures of success: cruel optimism and the paradox of academic women’s participation in Australian higher education (2017)Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists (2017)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
  • 2019Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence668 cited
  • 2016The pressure to publish pushes down quality204 cited
  • 2015Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions166 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics56 cited
  • 2021Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research54 cited
  • 2021Let’s do better: public representations of COVID-19 science53 cited
  • 2021Academic Journal Retractions and the COVID-19 Pandemic53 cited
  • 2020Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature47 cited
  • 2021Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers47 cited
  • 2023The impact of COVID-19 on global health journals: an analysis of impact factor and publication trends

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited
  • 2021How the scientific community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: A subject-level time-trend bibliometric analysis27 cited
  • 2022The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-1926 cited
  • 2020Publication Non Grata: The Challenge of Publishing Non-COVID-19 Research in the COVID Era22 cited
  • 2023Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research20 cited
  • 2024Tracking ChatGPT Research: Insights From the Literature and the Web20 cited
  • 2021Temporal evolution, most influential studies and sleeping beauties of the coronavirus literature20 cited
  • 2022COVID-19 article retractions in journals indexed in PubMed18 cited
  • 2021COVID-19 and diabetes: Analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus17 cited
  • 2020Competing with a pandemic: Trends in research design in a time of Covid-1916 cited