Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The effect of three basic task features on the sensitivity of acceptability judgment tasks

15 references·1 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992A power primer.44,746 cited
1996Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability724 cited
1998Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. By Wayne Cowart. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1997. Pp. xii, 187. Paper $17.95.357 cited
2013A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010344 cited
2017The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax327 cited
2009Toward a model of grammaticality judgments225 cited
2011Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures191 cited
2012Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger'sCore Syntax181 cited
2004Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: some wh-constraints in German150 cited
2013Interpreting numerals and scalar items under memory load135 cited
2011On the Informativity of Different Measures of Linguistic Acceptability121 cited
2011A Test of the Cognitive Assumptions of Magnitude Estimation: Commutativity Does Not Hold for Acceptability Judgments99 cited
2017Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments79 cited
2014Phantom readings: the case of modified numerals52 cited
2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Two methods to find truth-value gaps and their application to the projection problem of homogeneity

43 cited

Cited by

2023Island effects and amelioration by resumption in Jordanian Arabic: An auditory acceptability‐judgment study19 cited