References

• 2016The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate3,541 cited
• 2011Extraneous factors in judicial decisions1,431 cited
• 2018The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism1,071 cited
• 2016Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective812 cited
• 2017A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States530 cited
• 2019Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights430 cited
• 2019Online Courts and the Future of Justice414 cited
• 2017Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics400 cited
• 2016Artificial Intelligence318 cited
• 2007Technological Due Process277 cited
• 2016False Positives, False Negatives, and False Analyses: A Rejoinder to "Machine Bias: There's Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. and It's Biased against Blacks"242 cited
• 2018Judge v Robot? Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision-Making206 cited
• 2014Machine Learning and Law197 cited
• 2018Robot Rules184 cited
• 2019Beyond State v Loomis: artificial intelligence, government algorithmization and accountability